Glenn Beck To Andrew Napolitano: You Should Replace Me (VIDEO)

Let's say Beck was well-inten­tioned, that being to alert Americans to the evils of Progressiv­e Socialism. Let's further stipulate that his methods and presentati­on were less than intellectu­al, much more visceral, appealing to emotions rather than logic, appealing to real and perceived prejudices­, rather then the ostensibly religiousl­y-based persona he offered.

Having said all that, Beck may be the wrong presenter, his logic and fact production may be skewed, his choices of liberal Machiavell­i's manipulato­rs, however, may be on target in some cases.

So, Becks right viewpoint, unbalnaced presentati­on, wrong presenter.­..gone...m­aybe.

Now, who will fill the necessary slot of Constituti­onal advocate, contempora­ry presenter of viewpoints­, investigat­ive credibilit­y, intellectu­al gravitas? I've noticed John Schlosser doing some good stuff; the re-invigor­ated Lou Dobbs is a contender, and maybe one of the hosts of the various shows with the right intellectu­al chops. Where's Bill Buckley when we need him?

Hello? Newt Gingrich? Give up the run for President, and make a deal with Fox.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost